If one was to approach the question of single girl despair logically they would most likely point out that in prehistoric times the overall goal of life was to thrive and procreate and thus partnering was indeed vitally important. Indeed I might choose a slobbering, hairy, neanderthal over living alone, cold, hungry, and barren in a cave given the choice. But even then the goal was to chose the best partner was it not? The best slobbering, seal clubbing, hairy man you could find. You wouldn't have settled for anything other than the best unless... well unless you weren't the best bitch in the cave? OK, so I really don't know the mating habits and preferences of our prehistoric ancestors but still in the game of mating one should be selective of their mates. So again, why the phrase "snatch him up"? Men certainly don't sit around telling each other to quickly snatch up the first girl they see who knows a thing or two about football, or maybe they do. Perhaps there are divisions among men and women- those willing and able to snatch and settle and the more selective types.
Another thing I find completely ridiculous: single girls who spend their day as an amazonian goddess, kicking ass in 4 inch stilettos only to go home at night and cry because they don't have someone to cuddle with.
Granted companionship is a great thing and a relationship can be very beneficial but surely it is not so direly needed? Companionship can be found elsewhere than with a lover. I had a friend once claim that single women can't be friends with women in relationships. That once a women enters into a relationship she changes and no longer is able to understand the plight of the single girl. I didn't know there was a plight to begin with, but to divide women so drasticly seemed a bit unneeded to me. True to her word though this friend dumped every single girl she knew when she met her current boyfriend, wonder how that's working out...
No comments:
Post a Comment